What differentiates explicit rights from implicit rights?

The differentiation between explicit rights and implicit rights primarily lies in how they are defined and communicated. Explicit rights are those that are clearly and formally articulated in legal texts, such as statutes or constitutions. This means they have specific language indicating the rights being granted or protected, making them easily identifiable to individuals and enforceable in legal contexts.

In contrast, implicit rights do not have a clear wording or terminology indicating their existence. They are often inferred from existing laws, principles, or precedents and may arise from interpretations of explicit rights or from the context of a legal framework. These rights can be more ambiguous and require judicial interpretation to identify them.

This understanding allows for a clear distinction based on the nature of the communication surrounding the rights. It's worth noting that while some options touch upon aspects of rights, they do not accurately capture the essence of what makes explicit rights explicit and implicit rights implicit. For instance, the notion of universal agreement or cultural specificity does not directly address the concrete nature of the rights as articulated in legal texts.