What is one disadvantage of the inquisitorial system?

The disadvantage of the inquisitorial system highlighted by the selected answer revolves around the potential for a time-wasting process. Unlike the adversarial system, where each party presents their case in a more streamlined manner, the inquisitorial approach involves a judge playing an active role in investigating the facts of the case. This means that there can be extensive questioning, gathering of evidence, and deliberation on various aspects, which can lead to longer durations for cases to be resolved. The thoroughness intended in this system can sometimes result in delays and an extended timeline for judicial outcomes.

In contrast, the other options present aspects that are either not recognized as disadvantages or do not apply specifically to the inquisitorial system in the same manner. For example, the reliance on witness testimony is common in many legal systems and not inherently a disadvantage in the context of inquisitorial proceedings. The inability to involve a jury is a structural difference rather than a disadvantage, as the system is designed to be judge-centered. Strict adherence to evidential rules exists in various systems, but the inquisitorial model emphasizes a more flexible approach to evidence gathering and presentation, which can enhance fact-finding.