What is one implication of the adversary system's design?

The adversary system's design fundamentally empowers the parties involved in a legal dispute, allowing them to control their own cases. In this system, each party has the opportunity to present their arguments, gather evidence, and strategize independently in pursuit of their interests. This control promotes a competitive environment where both sides must advocate effectively for their positions, with the goal of swaying the judge or jury in their favor.

This characteristic of the adversary system is essential because it emphasizes the importance of each party's participation in the pursuit of justice. It enables a fair trial process where the contest between opposing sides is meant to bring out the truth through rigorous examination and cross-examination of evidence.

In contrast, while some other options may address aspects of the legal system, they do not accurately reflect the implications of the adversary system's design. For example, the system inherently requires opposing arguments as a means to reach the truth; it does not require a single narrative, as both sides can present their own versions of events. Additionally, the role of the jury is not suppressed; rather, in many cases, the jury plays a critical role in determining the outcome based on the arguments presented.