Which of the following is an example of a case that might be handled by the High Court?

The selection of very serious criminal cases, such as Pell v The Queen, as an example of a case that might be handled by the High Court is accurate because the High Court has jurisdiction to hear the most significant cases in Australia, particularly those involving substantial legal questions or significant public interest.

The High Court often acts as the final court of appeal, particularly in serious criminal matters. In the Pell case, the High Court's involvement was crucial because it dealt with complex legal principles and the interpretation of the law pertaining to serious crimes. This function aligns with the High Court’s role in ensuring that justice is served on a national scale, providing guidance on how laws should be applied in significant situations.

In contrast, minor traffic cases and disputes involving local council decisions are typically managed at lower levels of the judicial system, such as Magistrates' Courts or local tribunals, focusing on less severe legal issues. Similarly, while family law matters can involve serious issues, they are primarily adjudicated in Family Courts, not the High Court, unless they raise broader legal principles that require appellate review.