Which two circumstances allow judicial review to occur?

Judicial review is a process through which courts examine the actions of public authorities to ensure that they comply with the law and do not exceed their legal powers. The correct circumstances that allow judicial review to occur include breaches of natural justice and errors of law.

A breach of natural justice typically involves a failure to follow fair procedures, such as not providing a person the opportunity to be heard or not allowing for a fair decision-making process. This is crucial because it ensures that individuals have the right to a fair hearing and an unbiased decision-maker, which are foundational principles in administrative law.

An error of law refers to a situation where a decision is made based on an incorrect understanding or application of the law. This can include misinterpreting statutory provisions or failing to adhere to legal principles, which can lead to unjust outcomes.

Both of these circumstances provide a valid basis for courts to intervene, as they pertain to the legal and procedural integrity of the decision-making process. In contrast, the other options, while they may address issues related to decision-making, do not encapsulate the primary principles governing judicial review as effectively as the chosen answer.